Why an offshore boundary
The intervention point is offshore, where drifting biomass can still be redirected before it fragments into many nearshore arrival pathways.
The problem is a pathway, not a single beach
Sargassum arrives from the Caribbean and its fate is decided at a single fork: entering the Cozumel Channel, between the mainland and the west shore of the island, where the current concentrates it and the easterly winds push it onto the beaches of Quintana Roo, or rounding Punta Celarain and climbing along the exterior, eastern coast of the island, where the current carries it towards the Gulf of Mexico and it completes its cycle at sea.
GBO 60×60 exists to make the second route the normal one. Once the biomass fragments near the shore, intervention becomes expensive, repetitive and local, so the strategic value of the corridor depends on how large and predictable a share of the flow it actually diverts.
- Tulum
- Cozumel
- Playa del Carmen
- Puerto Morelos
- Benito Juárez
- Isla Mujeres
- Lázaro Cárdenas
Named in the source presentation as potential beneficiaries. A regional benefit map must show both expected protection and uncertainty, including routes that bypass the barrier.
The presentation reports summer influxes of up to 9,000 tonnes per day offshore and projects more than 80 million metric tonnes across a much wider Atlantic, Caribbean and Gulf domain in 2027. A daily local transport rate cannot be compared directly with a basin scale biomass estimate, and neither number independently determines the required capacity of the barrier.
What would count as success
Evaluate change against an agreed baseline, and include the ecological effects offshore and at the eventual destination of diverted biomass.
Coastal arrivals
Mass reaching named destinations, over defined periods and adjusted for transport and weather.
Water quality exposure
Nearshore indicators compared with baseline and control locations.
Collection demand
Volume and cost of beach and nearshore removal actually avoided.
Operational disruption
Availability of the barrier and the fleet, and the interruptions absorbed.
Ecological response
Habitat and species effects offshore, and fate of the diverted material.
Counterfactual
A defensible comparison case, without which no avoided loss can be claimed.
The project is therefore presented as a testable regional protection proposal with a clear physical mechanism, not as a guaranteed percentage reduction at every beach. Monitoring, modelling and adaptive operation are part of the mechanism itself.